An Unforgivable Sin?

Beethoven Detail

After watching Helvetica the other day, I got to thinking about type and especially the Modernist movement.  You can’t help but want to go make a 50’s-60’s era poster after watching that movie…. Well, at least, I can’t.

So riding my wave of inspiration, I set out to do some research on one of my favorite designers, Josef Müller-Brockmann, whose control of the grid is unsurpassed.  What is it about these posters that makes them so successful?  Was it the simplicity of the design?  The strength of the grid?  Or was it the type itself?  I set out to answer that last question in what may be the stupidest (and perhaps most unforgivable) exercise in design ever committed.  I would red0 some of Müller-Brockmann’s famous posters, leaving the iconic grotesk font behind and replacing it with something a little more… grotesque (sorry I couldn’t resist).  The gag-inducing typeface we love to hate, Comic Sans MS.

First of all, this post is not intended to exonerate Comic Sans from it’s rightful status as a disgusting typeface that should be avoided at all costs.  I myself am far too humble to attempt to disprove a generation of rabid hatred towards the most reviled font on Earth, however I did feel it would be a fun test to see just how strong Muller-Brockmann’s designs hold up when subjected to Helvetica’s Akzidenz Grotesk’s antithesis.  Not to mention that although I share a hatred of the font, I’ve never tried to use it seriously.  Everything deserves its due diligence I suppose, even Comic Sans.

Next, a couple of observations about Comic Sans, and perhaps this may shed a little bit of a more geeky light on why this font is so terrible.  First of all, and probably most importantly, the spacing is god-awful straight out of the box.  I assume this is because it is meant for comics that the spacing is very wide and could remain readable at small sizes, however if it is going to be used seriously (ha) then it needed a healthy dose of tracking and an even healthier dose of kerning.  I first set my tracking at a still-fairly-loose -20 and then went about kerning just about every other letter pair.  Notoriously horrible are numbers and punctuation.  A period does not need a gulf of white space between the final letter and the mark.  Also, spaces (between words, sentences) were gigantic as well, and needed to be tightened heavily; a good proof of the one-space-after-a-period rule.  Also, the larger and bolder it gets, the more it suffers and begins to look (even more) ridiculous.  However, after all of this work, Comic sans may in fact be somewhat passable…

Two more attempts here.

First, a disclaimer:  I tried to be as exacting as I could be with the placement of type and the overall grid and design so as to just focus the experiment on the one variable that had changed.  I know they are not perfect, but I’d say close enough to evaluate the type on its own.  Also, on some of the source posters I was referencing, I couldn’t see the smallest type clearly enough to reproduce it perfectly, so I apologize in advance if I’ve seriously butchered some German here.

Honestly, I don’t think they are that terrible.  I’d even go as far to say that the Beethoven one doesn’t look half bad.  That is saying a lot about Muller-Brockmann’s original designs (and literally nothing about my design skills by the way – that’s not the point here).  They not only stand the test of time, but they stand the ruthless replacement of his original type.  I’d say, at the very least, it proves the strength of a simple and rigidly gridded design, and at the very most, gives Comic Sans a reason to feel good about itself until the next screed is unleashed (poor guy).

What do you think?  Does the design hold up?  Was Helvetica Akzidenz Grotesk (Update: Thanks Justin for correcting me!) such a critical part of the Modernist Design era that it’s absence actually would have precluded it’s existence?  Does it make you feel a bit better about Comic Sans?  Or does it still make you dry-heave a bit?  Have I committed an unforgivable sin in defacing Müller-Brockmann’s designs?  Sound off in the comments…

This entry was posted in typography and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

5 Comments

  1. Posted September 13, 2009 at 3:35 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think Helvetica was necessary to the posters achievement, it could have been done with other typefaces as well.

    CS can’t pull a geometric poster like the above, without it adding a different meaning to the overall piece. I’ve only seen one serious site using CS where it really hits smack on, at least if you agree with the content that is. It is always used in context with quoting people who’s view is rather obscure or anti science.

    Thanks for your thoughts

  2. Justin Craigen
    Posted September 17, 2009 at 2:41 pm | Permalink

    JMB was a very strict (almost exclusive) user of Akzidenz Grotesk, not Helvetica.

    Still…an interesting experiment!

  3. faber.
    Posted September 17, 2009 at 2:50 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Justin – I’ve corrected the post to reflect that…

    It does make sense though… The Beethoven poster was designed in 1955 and Helvetica wasn’t even released until ‘57….

  4. Posted September 18, 2009 at 6:55 pm | Permalink

    Hehehehe, you actually did it! Making Comic Sans look good is almost every designer’s Gordian Knot :) ) But I doubt it could’ve been done without Mr. Brockmann’s help. Congrats!

  5. Posted August 20, 2010 at 8:53 am | Permalink

    I could understand if a whole document were typed in CS (still, it wouldn’t annoy me as it appears to annoy so many others). But the CS actually looks quite good in those posters!

7 Trackbacks

  1. [...] on a lighter note, a variation on a Müller-Brockmann theme. (That will give Antonio, over at AisleOne, nightmares). [...]

  2. [...] on a lighter note, a variation on a Müller-Brockmann theme. (That will give Antonio, over at AisleOne, nightmares). [...]

  3. By Tungsten type | More On Design on September 17, 2009 at 10:03 pm

    [...] on a lighter note, a variation on a Müller-Brockmann theme. (That will give Antonio, over at AisleOne, nightmares). [...]

  4. By Tweets that mention An Unforgivable Sin? -- Topsy.com on September 19, 2009 at 1:08 am

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Marius Ursache, Michael Faber and Iancu Barbarasa. Iancu Barbarasa said: Hahaha, finally! Comic Sans can look good, but only thanks to Mr Brockmann and Michael Faber http://bit.ly/vyPIE [...]

  5. By Twisted Princesses on September 22, 2009 at 4:27 pm

    [...] love it when talented designers/illustrators use their gifts for pure evil.  Not evil like inserting comic sans into Muller-Brockmann posters evil, evil like destroy all my fond childhood innocence and scar me for life evil.  Excellent. This [...]

  6. By Tungsten type | meshdairy on October 29, 2009 at 3:20 am

    [...] on a lighter note, a variation on a Müller-Brockmann theme. (That will give Antonio, over at AisleOne, nightmares). [...]

  7. By AMB Album » Tungsten type on January 28, 2010 at 5:48 pm

    [...] on a lighter note, a variation on a Müller-Brockmann theme. (That will give Antonio, over at AisleOne, nightmares). [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • RSS
    rule
    RSS chatter portfolio photography
  • rule
  • Hello

    I’m Michael Faber, a freelance graphic designer in Durham, North Carolina with an interest in print design, branding, typography, photography, dogs, cooking, letterpress, and a bunch of other goodness. I love talking design so if you have a project in mind or just want to chat about the relative merits of postmodernist typography or traditional Southern cuisine (I’m a Western NC barbeque guy - please don’t hold it against me), feel free to contact me.

  • rule